Tuesday, October 28, 2014

"3 out of 4 stars"

Aaah men! These ego-maniac, car loving creatures. Good Will Hunting ended by saying "it was all about a girl", this one started by being all about a car...and a cute little puppy to be fair. I think Jerry Seinfeld's notion of men not having any thoughts might be relevant in this case! "We like women, we want women but that's pretty much as far as we've thought!"

"John Wick" makes "Taken" look like a sad excuse for an action movie. Yup. Ol' Neo has still got some tricks left up his sleeve. Gotta love seeing Keanu Reeves kill people. I think movies should be judged in the context of their genre. Me and my friend were pretty pumped to see this movie after hearing the raves about it and an 8.3 score on iMDB. I love seeing movies with my friend "P", 'cause her insights affirm mine. Of course, this movie was very smart and down right entertaining but frankly, we both thought no matter how good this kind of a movie is, you'd never give it 4 stars (of course there are the likes of Roger Ebert who give movies like Spiderman 2, 4 stars but that's Ebert. His words are holy). Actually, I am feeling pretty generous right now with my 3 star ranking of this movie. I considered 3.5 for a brief moment (just because I was biased by hearing all these good reviews) but then I remembered Eastern Promises. Boy, would that have been a mistreatment of one of Cronenberg's masterpieces!

If you want to see a jazzed up version of Eastern Promises, go see this one. I highly recommend it (guys with Mustang obsession more than the others would relate to it) BUT if you are more interested in seeing an A-class movie with A-class acting, then go see the real "Viggo"! But John Wick is not about A's. It's about forgetting the world for 2 hours and watching Keanu get the revenge you want from the world and freeing your anger and saying bye bye to $11! But seriously, again, in its genre, THIS is considered a masterpiece. For now, though. It can definitely be outranked by other action movies (and newer technology!) and it will definitely won't prompt you to watch it again. But if you want to be able to watch an action movie more than twice, this might be it. This doesn't go out to the die hard fans of Die Hard. Be faithful. There's a reason it's a classic.

Sunday, October 26, 2014

Gone Girl


"3.5 stars out of 4"

The thrilling thing about Gone Girl is how realistic it is. I have met pathological liars. Heck, I have been friends with them. Have been robbed of my trust and naivety. But the scary part is that they are among us, and not only they are not going away but they are sticking to their guns and standing their ground. I day dream myself. But there is a very fine line between daydreaming and taking personal action in directing that dream in real life, no matter how scary that might be. There must've been a comprehensive psychological analysis behind this book/screenplay for bringing this specific character into life (I am not mentioning which, just so I don't spoil it for people who haven't seen it yet). But all I want to say that the people who cannot distinguish between reality and thoughts are usually the ones who are excellent writers or are very intellectually advanced in the literature field.

Another brilliant move about making this movie was getting the writer of the book herself to write the screenplay for this movie and what an excellent job has she done. You might have noticed by now  from my previous reviews is that my favorite type of screenplay is a "witty" one and this one is very high class in that regard.

Career-wise and personal-life-wise, Ben Affleck has come a very long long way throughout the years but unfortunately he's still what I consider to be a mediocre actor at most. A very good director is what he has become and what he should stick to.

However, his counterpart in this movie is who takes this movie far ahead of its genre. Rosamund Pike is not the fleeting "Jane Bennett" that we remember anymore. She has stepped out of the shadow of the likes of Keira Knightly and stepped into the heart of the spotlight. Her portrayal of Amy Dunne will make your hair stand on end. I am not sure if her gaze at the beginning of the movie was different than the one at the end or not but what I saw (or what I was under the illusion of) went from helpless and insecure to "having someone whipped"! Like I said, I am not sure if the two scenes were actually different or it was something weird that my mind was trying to pull off on me, but either way it was a brilliant move...whether Fincher had intentionally made two very identical scenes slightly different or that his storytelling had made my mind make up stories of its own.

And my final word...twists, twists, twists. Gotta love them. I'm guessing even bad twists, can make a movie memorable. I recently saw Good Will Hunting (I know...waaay overdue!) and I couldn't love the ending any better. I will leave that for another post but what a bad timing on my part in giving an example. It shouldn't have followed the sentence about the "bad twist" because Good Will Hunting is an exceptional movie. I just couldn't help mentioning it. And its twist!

Enjoy this movie. It was about time we got a good one after a dead year for cinema.

Sunday, October 5, 2014

The Disappearance of Eleanor Rigby



"2.75 stars out of 4"!

I went to see this movie because of being a fan of James McAvoy’s work and I wasn’t disappointed to find that he was as charismatic as ever. But at the same time I found this movie to be an independent gem in a year that is dead, cinema-wise, and unsurprisingly, it has had the worst ticket sale in 13 years.

To give a very brief storyline, the story revolves around the lives of a couple and their break up. The director very wisely keeps you asking what has happened to them for a very long time and engages you in every second of the movie. It is about relationships and the hardships of life. Although I liked the chemistry between McAvoy and Chastain, their performances were not convincing at times. Actually, that is not true. Erase that. What I mean is, sometimes it seemed like the actors themselves did not believe the words they were saying. The dramatic dialogue was good; I had the most trouble finding the romantic part to be acted out well. Don’t get me wrong, the dialogue in this movie was the best part, I had problems with the acting. But back to dialogue…I don’t know if it is part of growing up or just getting older and being more cognizant of what really life is like, but if you listen carefully, you will find the dialogue to be very relatable. To give an example, I liked the part where one of the parents was talking about how their kid (now grown-up) comes up to them and tells them that the parent has done something wrong so many years ago and accusing the parent of having a bad effect on the child. But the parent couldn’t remember what it was. That is so true. I sometimes tell my parents like “remember the time when you said this or did that and blah blah blah”. Oh, grow up! So they did or said something that wasn’t that horrible to begin with but probably triggered by a crappy behavior on your side. Imagine being handed a child at 25 and being told to raise that kid. Of course, there are going to be screw-up moments. Doesn’t mean they didn’t do a top-notch job!

Anyway, in this drought of good movies, this one was touching and smart. As I have mentioned many many times before, I think the most important part about a movie for me is the ending. A movie can be good throughout but it’s the final act that makes it either memorable or discard-able (yeah I just made up a word). This movie, as you can obviously see based on my ramble, had a very good ending. I don’t want to spoil it for you so I’m not saying story-wise how it ended, but just technical-wise, it was smart. The director hollows your heart out one last time before he throws you a rope in a hollowed darkness.

Just one criticism: the movie ran a little longer than it needed to.


P.S. A quick tip. DO NOT see this movie with a friend who has just been through a break up. Bad baaad idea!

Wednesday, August 27, 2014

Magic in the Moonlight


"2 stars out of 4"
 
There is no such thing as a “bad” Woody Allen movie. Just that there are those that you want to watch over and over again: Manhattan, Match Point, or even Scoop (which I love) Hannah and Her Sisters…Should I go on? And then there are those that you watch once, somewhat enjoy the enchantment and then you can let dust sit on it (off the top of my mind Everyone Says I Love You). Well, that’s not completely fair. Allen movies deserve to be dusted. This one is one of the movies that you can let dust sit on it.

I don’t take criticism well and don’t want to bring the same down feeling on someone else, so I’ll start off with this. For someone who brings us Match Point, Vicky Christina Barcelona, Scoop (not critically acclaimed…actually quite the opposite, but had to throw it in there), Midnight in Paris, and Blue Jasmine among others, in the span of only 8 years, I think seeing a not even terrible, just “okay”, movie from him is completely fine. So, give him a break!

The storyline, as you might very well know, is about a girl who claims to be in contact with spirits and the other world or a “medium” (played by Emma Stone), and a magician (played by Colin Firth), who is invited by a fellow magician to meet this “medium” to unravel her work being fake.

I believe Allen had written this magician part for himself. A typical Allen characteristic that we have all come to know, who is afraid of death and always dwells on the thought of after life and seeks a reassurance that life will not end by death. This same character, as he puts it himself, desperately needs to know that the girl is not a fake and that afterlife truly exists. When I came out of the theater, all I could think was that Allen himself would’ve been perfect for this part. Much funnier than the English gentleman that Firth is (he is one of my favorite actors, it’s just that he wasn’t exactly cut out for this part; whereas the stuttering, nervous, overly-confident Allen would’ve made this movie memorable. Probably one of the reasons why Scoop has been engraved in my mind as a memorable movie). Probably the only reason that held him back from playing this part was his age. Another thought that kept bugging me while watching the movie was that I hope he sticks around much much longer…I can’t imagine a year go by without a feature from him.

Back to the movie from my (ironically) grave thoughts…I wasn’t particularly fond of the quick fix that Allen used by the end to bring everything to the end. Many things remained unresolved, that for me was a little uncomfortable! I mean, there are movies that are supposed to let you lingering so you can have your own take on it. But I guess what happened here was that he had this story of life and death and he didn’t care much how it should come to an end. The same goes for the love story. It wasn’t well thought out and there was little to no chemistry. He didn’t go in depth as much as he should have to show us the relationship that grows. It was…it was too abrupt!

BUT! I bring this note to an end with this…the 2 stars that I have given to this movie is not to be compared with my previous 2 star-rated movies. It is only to be used for comparison with other Allen movies. Otherwise it would be an extrapolation (didn’t think I can apply biostatistics to daily life. Huh! New horizons to be explored!). The magic of Allen’s work still is tangible in this movie and you’ll enjoy the dialogue as much as any of his other works…only that the frequency of enjoyment will not be as often as some of his past films!

Footnote: Thank you for condolences over Chris Martin’s coupling with Jennifer Lawrence. But if he is to end up with another person, I’d rather it be that crazy, adorable Jennifer Lawrence. I wish I could call her my BFF one day. This wish beats the thought of having Martin as my BF!

Friday, February 28, 2014

My predictions for Oscars 2014

Ooh, I almost forgot to post this! I had written the draft and was just waiting to post it the day before the Oscars. So, here we go.

You can find my predictions (hopes!) in bold, on top of each list for nominees. I even put an asterisk before each one so you wouldn't miss it! I considered writing a sentence or two about each decision but I decided to go with one word for all: Brilliance. I had a hard time deciding who should win for best directing. I love Marty. I hope he wins. But I guess Alfonso Cuaron will. Gravity was a marvel. He deserves it. It's a tough one. And like I said before, for a year's work, the Oscar should go to Matthew McConaughey. But for a performance that could be an actor's work of a lifetime, it definitely is Leo.

Best Picture:

* The Wolf of Wall Street
American Hustle
Captain Phillips
Dallas Buyers Club
Gravity
Her
Nebraska
Philomena
12 Years a Slave


Best Actor in a Leading Role:

* Leonardo DiCaprio (The Wolf of Wall Street)
Christian Bale (American Hustle)
Bruce Dern (Nebraska)
Chiwetel Ejiofor (12 Years a Slave)
Matthew McConaughey (Dallas Buyers Club)

Best Actress in a Leading Role:

* Cate Blanchett (Blue Jasmine)
Amy Adams (American Hustle)
Sandra Bullock (Gravity)
Judi Dench (Philomena)
Meryl Streep (August: Osage County)

Best Actor in a Supporting Role:

* Jared Leto (Dallas Buyers Club)
Barkhad Abdi (Captain Phillips)
Bradley Cooper (American Hustle)
Michael Fassbender (12 Years a Slave)
Jonah Hill (The Wolf of Wall Street)

Best Actress in a Supporting Role:

* Jennifer Lawrence (American Hustle)
Sally Hawkins (Blue Jasmine)
Lupita Nyong'o (12 Years a Slave)
Julia Roberts (August: Osage County)
June Squibb (Nebraska)

Best Directing:

* Alfonso Cuaron (Gravity)
David O. Russell (American Hustle)
Alexander Payne (Nebraska)
Steve McQueen (12 Years a Slave)
Martin Scorsese (The Wolf of Wall Street)

Best Animation:

* Despicable Me 2
The Croods
Ernest & Celestine
Frozen
The Wind Rises

Best Adapted Screenplay:

* The Wolf of Wall Street (Terence Winter)
Before Midnight (Richard Linklater, Julie Delpy, Ethan Hawke)
Captain Phillips (Billy Ray)
Philomena (Steve Coogan, Jeff Pope)
12 Years a Slave (John Ridley)


Best Original Screenplay:

* Blue Jasmine (Woody Allen)
American Hustle (Eric Warren Singer, David O. Russell)
Dallas Buyers Club (Craig Borten, Melisa Wallack)
Her (Spike Jonze)
Nebraska (Bob Nelson)

Saturday, February 22, 2014

Best movie of the year: Wolf of Wall Street

"4 stars"

I don't care what anyone else says. This movie was the best of the year. Hands down. Sure, I walked in the theater having somewhat of high hopes. After all, it was made by one of the geniuses in film history. If you have been following my posts, I think you know how fond of Marty Scorsese I have become over the past year. I was pretty sure that I will get the worth of my ticket when I walked out of the theater. But let me tell you this. I gained a lot more. What an out-of-this-world-experience it was! Boy oh boy!

I think I can compare this to American Hustle for both being made based on true stories and both having similar story lines. But the difference between the two, for me the viewer, was that in AH's case, I couldn't wait to get out of the theater. I was constantly checking my watch and was bored and if it wasn't for the twist at the end, I would've been really pissed! Granted, it had great acting, 'cause David O. Russel knows how to get it out of the actors. Of course, no one can compete with Woody Allen in that regard but still...his Silver Linings Playbook was one of the best movies I got to watch last year. But this one was meh. And again, if it wasn't for Jennifer Lawrence and Christian Bale's acting, it wouldn't have been considered as one of the best of the year. I still don't know why Bradley Cooper got nominated. He was just "OK".

Back to the point. When I walked in the theater, having seen AH before WWS, and having the mindset of "if I got bored watching a two hour movie...imagine how it would be like for a 3-hour-long one". But I enjoyed every second of it. I devoured it with my soul. I didn't even realize how the time passed. It was one of Marty's best for sure. I recently heard that it became his highest grossing movie. And it was very well deserved. But what surprised me the most about this movie was Leo DiCaprio's performance. He has come a long way since his "pretty boy" time and he has become a great actor (thanks to Marty in great part). But this one...he out-ranked himself! I couldn't believe what I was seeing. Although he had become a good actor, but he always had some kind of an "uptightness" in his acting! It was like he held something back. But in Wolf of Wall Street, you can see him having let go of everything. Nothing was held back (the scene where he drags himself to get to his car...astonishing). And for the first time I actually enjoyed his performance. He probably needed a Jonah Hill to bring out the unrestrained actor in him. (btw if you haven't watched their act together on SNL when Jonah was hosting, watch it right now! It was hilarious).

I was having a hard time deciding who should win this year for best acting, McConaughey or Leo...and I decided to go with Leo. They both fall almost in the same boat of having been associated as "pretty boys of Hollywood", but if I had to choose one for "one performance" it would be Leo's. Also, he's been nominated many times before and I guess it's his "turn" as Pacino put it once about his own win. Otherwise, if they were awarding achievement for a year, it would've been be McConaughey, for sure. I need to dedicate a whole other post to him and True Detective.

This year's Golden Globes was the best I've seen so far. Basically because everyone I wanted to, won! It used to be people who I rooted for, and people who I knew would win. But I'm so glad that this year, people I was rooting for, were the best ones as well! The only disappointment for me (I think you can guess it by now) was American Hustle winning best comedy movie of the year over Wolf of Wall Street.

I hope the Academy, in all their wisdom, won't make the same mistake as the Hollywood Foreign Press Association.

I will leave my Oscars predictions (or hopes actually!) for next week, when we're closer to the ceremony.

So, the take home lesson, kids, here is to go watch Wolf of Wall Street. If you have watched it already watch it again. I have always had a short temper and my nerves are growing weaker by the hour, making me leave the vicinity of where outrageous conversations are taking place. Like for today, I was at a baby shower, and there was this girl telling my friend how she didn't like WWS and she suggested us go watch Safe Haven instead because it was extraordinary! I have respect for your decisions. If you're not into movies as deep as nerds like me and you only watch movies to have fun or shed a few tears over a romantic movie, that's your choice in life and that is absolutely fine. A whole part of industry is dedicated to you guys. But if you're not going to appreciate movies as an art form, please do us a favor and don't watch these movies so that we wouldn't have to listen to your unappreciative comments. GAH! I hope you haven't had to deal with these kinds of people. Or at least your tolerance rate is higher than mine.

By the way, do people over at the Golden Globes production have the worst cut for nominee pieces or what?! I am talking about these short videos they show when announcing the nominees, and God are they bad! Compare it to the SAG awards, when they introduce the nominees you can guess who is going to win based on that short segment. But in GG's case, these videos don't make sense at all. They don't even show what needs to be shown about the nominees for best picture so people can get an idea of what the movie is about. I find it ridiculous. For such a celebrated award show, they need to up their quality a bit.

In a completely different note, how on earth did Sandra Bullock got nominated for best acting for Gravity?! I don't know if you've read my post about that movie, but I didn't find her performance even remotely outstanding.

Speaking of Gravity, how funny was Tina Fey's joke about George Clooney and how Gravity shows he would rather float away in space and die than spend another second with a woman his own age. I was laughing my ass off.

I can go on and on from one paragraph to a whole other one like this for days and stretch out this post longer than it ever should've been. I promise this will be my last statement here. But I learned recently that this is actually a trait of day-dreamers. I'm an avid day-dreamer. My sister used to call me crazy because I would gaze into space and start laughing because of the conversation that was going on in my head. But I've heard that we, day-dreamers, are good at solving problems. Probably because of spending too much time in our heads going from one thing to another. Anywho, everything just points out my awesomeness! Hehe. How lucky are you for knowing me. Oh, stop it. No, you're awesome. No you...okay yeah it's just me.

Why I have been away



Ok, so I wanted to start writing again and as I have mentioned a few times before, I am the ultimate master of procrastination! I knew that perfectionists tend to procrastinate because they are afraid that if they start early, they would not have any excuses for an imperfect piece. Whereas if they start late, they can say "oh, well...I didn't have enough time and that's why it's not my best work!" or in the opposite case (at least for me) if we actually CAN deliver something that's surprisingly good without having put too much effort into it, we (I) proud ourselves for it! I also learned from our graduate coordinator, who had this meeting for grad students to encourage us to write, she said that writers tend to procrastinate because they are afraid of not writing a perfect read. So, there you go! Two legit reasons for my absence!

The other reason was that I don't take criticism well. If somebody criticizes me or my work, I become suicidal! So, other than being grateful for my dreams of becoming an actress not coming true, I also started second guessing my choice of dream job for the future. I mean, I'm all for "constructive criticism" and I believe in its necessity for the improvement in any kind of job and art, especially cinema. But making a career out of essentially making people's lives miserable...eh...may not be the best thing. We're talking about people's energy and months and years of efforts and passion here. To crush their hopes and what they've put their life into is harsh. I always try to put myself in people's shoes when I think of doing something to someone. And honestly, if I had made a movie and someone said it's not good, I'd be ready to hang myself! Not everyone is like me...but even if there is only one person out there who's like that (and I'm sure there is)...yeah, I don't wanna do that.

The third reason for my absence. I originally wanted to talk about how life was hard and miserable and I had so much to do. And then I said to myself "oh, boo-hoo"! So you are going to a good school in a country that so many people dream of visiting, let alone live in...so you've got to take some extra courses or spend a few more hours in the lab or stay up late from time to time in your cozy, warm home. Suck it up! It's not even nearly half as hard as almost all the people around you. So, no excuses! If I wanna follow my dreams, this is the very least I could do. Squeeze writing into my schedule. People relocate and would even bear being homeless for a few days just to get what they want (I'm thinking of aspiring actors who move to hollywood here). What I'm dealing with is nothing. And they didn't take no for an answer. And neither will I. I applied to get a kind of a scholarship by the Ebert foundation for 6 aspiring journalists that provided the chance of covering the news from the Sundance Festival this past month, while covering the travel costs for their stay. I didn't get it needless to say. It was a long shot anyway. I was a bit disappointed but I thought maybe it's time to give up on it. But then I remembered that JK Rowling had taken the script for Harry Potter to 12 publishers before finding the one that did publish it. So, there's still hope. And not everyone needs to be successful in their 20's. I still have time! Hehe.

So, why I decided to come back, you're asking?

Aside from the burning sensation in my fingertips to start typing and ranting again since the Golden Globes, I took a test recently on buzzfeed (lame I know) about what career best suits my personality, and based on the results I should become a writer. The second and third options were director and producer. And I was like, that's good enough for me! I'll take it. I also like reading articles that Dr David Katz writes and recently found out that a friend works for him and I can get a chance of working for him as well and start learning about writing. So, there you go. I don't necessarily need to write about movies (though that's what I love to do) but we'll see what happens.

So stay tuned for a few posts in the coming days, if not hours!

P.S. Getting a new computer was another incentive! Hehe.